Effects of Drying Methods on Different Characteristics of Chokeberry

DRYING CHARACTERISTICS OF CHOKEBERRY

Authors

  • Cigdem Mustu Ceylan Department of Food Processing, Vocational School, Bilecik Seyh Edebali University, 11100, Bilecik, Turkey   &   Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Davutpasa Campus, 34210, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Selma Kayacan Cakmakoglu Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Davutpasa Campus, 34210, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Hatice Bekiroglu Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Davutpasa Campus, 34210, Istanbul, Turkey   &   Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Sirnak University, Sirnak, 73300, Turkey
  • Mustafa Yaman Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Engineering and Natural Sciences Faculty, Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, 34303, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Alican Akcicek Department of Gastronomy and Culinary Arts, Faculty of Tourism, Kocaeli University, 41080, Kocaeli, Turkey
  • Osman Sagdic Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Davutpasa Campus, 34210, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Salih Karasu Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Davutpasa Campus, 34210, Istanbul, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56042/jsir.v83i12.10284

Keywords:

Anthocyanin, Bioactive compounds, Chokeberry, Phenolic compound, Ultrasound-assisted vacuum drying

Abstract

This research was aimed to determine effect of four different drying techniques, namely Hot Air Drying (HAD), Vacuum Drying (VD), Ultrasound-Assisted Vacuum Drying (USVD), and Freeze Drying (FD) on drying time, total bioactive content, phenolic and anthocyanin profile, surface characteristic and color change of chokeberries. The novelty of this study is the first application of USVD in chokeberry drying. The drying times were recorded as 2100, 1380, and 1200 minutes for HAD, VD, and USVD, respectively, indicating that the application of ultrasound significantly reduced the drying time. Total Phenolic Content (TPC) value of the dried samples varied between 53.15 and 81.18 GAE/g. The individual phenolic and anthocyanin content were determined by HPLC methods. The phenolic profile of the chokeberries showed that protocatechuic acid, catechin, and chlorogenic acid were the major phenolic compounds. The protocatechuic acid value changed between 707.04 and 1126.49 mg/100 and FD showed highest protocatechuic acid value. The anthocyanin profile test showed that the cyanidin-3-O-galactoside was the most prevalent anthocyanin and its value was found as 27725–198674 mcg/100g. DE value was used to determine effect of drying techniques on color change of the dried samples. DE value was found as 8.07–11.98.  SEM analysis was used to determine effect of drying on surface characteristic of chokeberries. The samples dried by FD and USVD showed more porous structure. This study concluded that USVD emerged as a promising alternative to VD and HAD due to its shorter drying time, higher retention of bioactive compounds, and better color preservation.

Downloads

Published

09-12-2024

How to Cite

Effects of Drying Methods on Different Characteristics of Chokeberry: DRYING CHARACTERISTICS OF CHOKEBERRY. (2024). Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research (JSIR), 83(12), 1284-1294. https://doi.org/10.56042/jsir.v83i12.10284

Similar Articles

11-20 of 21

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.