Post-Publication Review: The Role of Science News Outlets and Social Media

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v71i4.14254

Keywords:

Pre-publication reviews, Post-publication reviews, Journal-led peer review, Community-led peer review, Academic misconduct, Research integrity

Abstract

This article explores the significant role of post-publication review in maintaining research integrity and the potential of science news outlets and social media to improve the process. By examining recent cases, this article reveals the vulnerabilities of pre-publication peer review and suggests a more inclusive approach. The importance of broader public scrutiny is emphasized, as retractions in these cases occurred only after gaining significant attention on social media. The term "peer-review" should be expanded to include various experts and platforms beyond traditional academic journals. The incidents examined  in this study underscore the necessity of openness and vigilance in maintaining research integrity, especially in the era of artificial intelligence and digital platforms. Researchers need to understand that research integrity extends beyond journal-led pre-publication reviews. They should also apply their scientific intellect by conducting post-publication reviews.

Author Biographies

Dasapta Erwin Irawan

Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia

Olivier Pourret

UniLaSalle, AGHYLE, Beauvais, France 

Lonni Besançon

Linköping University, Sweden

Sandy Hardian Susanto Herho

University of California, Riverside: Riverside, CA, USA

Ilham Akhsanu Ridlo

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany

Juneman Abraham

Bina Nusantara University, Indonesia

Downloads

Published

2024-11-30