Trademark Law Declared by the Supreme Court of India in Twenty-First Century (2000–2009) — I

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v28i5.3016

Keywords:

Trademark, Supreme Court of India, Law Declared, Article 141, The Constitution of India, The Trade Marks Act 1940, The Trade and Merchandise Marks Act 1958, The Trade Marks Act 1999, Bench, Decisions, Dissenting, Concurring, Constructed Meaning, Principles, Interpretation-Construction, Twentieth Century, First Decade, Unwary Purchaser, Trademark Trafficking, Trademark Infringement, Passing Off Action, Remedy

Abstract

The Parliament of India makes, amends, and unmakes law. The Supreme Court of India (hereinafter, the Supreme Court),
under Article 141 of the Constitution of India, declares the law and makes and unmakes the law. These constitutional powers of
two branches are related but separate. The Supreme Court in the first decade of 21st century has delivered 23 decisions on the
trademark law. On an average, the Supreme Court has decided 2.3 (point three) trademark cases in a year; or one trademark
case in 158.82 (point eight two) days or in .43 (point four three) years. A review of reported 21st century decisions reveals that
the Court has: (i) declared trademark law in 17 decisions; (ii) not only interpreted the provisions of the statutes but has also
constructed them; (iii) not declared anything on the constitutionality of the trademark statutes as no such question of
constitutionality was brought before it; (iv) delivered all the decisions unanimously as no dissenting or concurring judgment is
reported; and (v) decided maximum number of cases by Division Bench (21) and remaining 2 cases by Full Bench. It is also
observed that no sitting or acting Chief Justices of India was on the Bench in any of the cases. Paper proceeds with the same
argument and method as developed in the first four papers on patent law, copyright law, design law and trademark law in
twentieth-century published under the theme ‘IP Laws Declared by the Supreme Court’. This Paper seeks to cull out the
principles of trademark law as declared by the Supreme Court in the first decade of the twenty-first century.

Author Biographies

Aqa Raza, Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal GlobalUniversity, Sonipat 131001 Haryana

B.A., LL.B. (Hons.); LL.M. in IPRs (Gold Medalist) from Faculty of Law, Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), Aligarh, India | UGC-NET; and reading for Ph.D. in Law at The National Law Institute University, Bhopal 462044 Madhya Pradesh, India

Aqa Raza is working as Assistant Lecturer at Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat 131001 Haryana, India. During his studies at Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), he served as the Vice President of AMU Law Society and Editor of AMU Law Society Review. He has worked on the Projects of the Government of Madhya Pradesh (GoMP) and drafted several policy and scheme documents for the GoMP including 'Madhya Pradesh Resident Welfare Association Policy, 2020'. His research and teaching areas include Intellectual Property Rights and Constitutional Law.

Ghayur Alam, National Law Institute University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 044 India

Senior Professor of Business Laws & IPR Chair; Dean, Under-Graduate Studies; Head, Department of Intellectual Property & Business Law; Chairperson, Centre of Business and Commercial Laws; Chairperson, Centre of Science Technology & Law at National Law Institute University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-19