Adoption of Research Utility Tools Among Research Scholars in Central University Libraries of North India

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v73i2.28601

Keywords:

Adoption of Research Utility Tools (ARUTs), Research Planning Management (RPM), Technology Adoption, UTAUT/UTAUT1

Abstract

In today’s world, adopting advanced research utility tools (ARUTs) for information access are essential for every research scholar to maximize digital innovation in their research work and academic field or other research domains. Now a day’s researchers are recognized the power of these research utility tools in maximizing their capabilities and effectively addressing complex issues. This study explores various research utility tools, focusing on their practical applications and research scholars’ perceptions of these tools, ultimately leading to the development of even more effective research tools for their benefit. This study investigated among research scholars from seven well-known Central Universities of North India who have vast experience in research utility tools. The researchers shared a structured questionnaire administrated via an online survey link on WhatsApp and email to collect data from 210 research scholars from January 15, 2026 to January 30, 2026. The descriptive statistical analysis showed a strong correlation between performance expectancy and behavioral intention (r = 0.71, p < .01), as similar facilitating conditions (r = 0.67, p < .01), effort expectancy (r = 0.64, p < .01), and social influence (r = 0.52, p < .01). These results clearly demonstrate that perceived usefulness, ease of use, social influence, and institutional support play a significant role in adoption of research utility tools in universities. The results of multiple regression analysis confirmed that performance expectancy (β = 0.45, p < .001) is the strongest predictor of behavioral intention to use research utility tools. Accordingly, effort expectancy (β = 0.29, p < .001), facilitating conditions (β = 0.26, p < .001), social influence (β = 0.21, p < .001) and this model explains (68%) of the variance in behavioral intentions (R² = 0.68), indicating the model's high explanatory power (F = 108.72, p < .001). 

Author Biographies

  • Ankit Kumar, Ph.D. Research Scholar

    Department of Library and Information Science, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow, Pin 226025, Uttar Pradesh, India.

  • M. P. Singh, Professor and Dean

    School of Information Science and Technology, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow, Pin 226025, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-05

How to Cite

Adoption of Research Utility Tools Among Research Scholars in Central University Libraries of North India. (2026). Annals of Library and Information Studies , 73(2), 144-154. https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v73i2.28601

Similar Articles

21-30 of 110

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.