Effectiveness of Certification Marks and Eco-labels in Reducing Greenwashing: A Comparative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v30i6.15643Keywords:
Eco-conscious, Investment Integrity, ESG, Greenwashing, Regulatory Monitoring, Eco-labels, Sustainable LabellingAbstract
The problem of greenwashing, in which the sustainability credentials of financial products are overstated or misrepresented, has been highlighted by the growing popularity of eco-conscious investing. With an emphasis on intellectual property rights (IPR), this study investigates how well certification marks and eco-labels work to curb greenwashing. In order to guarantee authenticity and integrity in sustainability claims, several marks and labels are used. The study looks at cases of false labelling, false claims, and a lack of transparency, emphasising the negative effects of greenwashing, which include diminished confidence in the financial sector, capital misallocation, and a lag in the achievement of global sustainability objectives. The study highlights the need for regulatory oversight, the establishment of precise guidelines and standards for sustainable labelling, independent confirmation of sustainability claims, and open reporting on ESG practices as ways to combat greenwashing. Campaigns for investor education and awareness as well as cooperation amongst many stakeholders—including government organisations, financial institutions, and non-profits—are seen essential. To preserve the integrity of sustainable finance and make sure that investments actually benefit the environment and society while safeguarding investors' interests, it is crucial to combat greenwashing in eco-conscious investing. The report emphasises how crucial it is to promote accountability, ethics, and openness in sustainable financing.